Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leila Marie Lawler's avatar

My view is that phonics is the "grammar" of reading (in the trivium sense) and thus, necessary. The poetic draws the learner, but one must have the tools.

But I have to note that I never went more than halfway through 100 Easy Lessons with my children who used it. It's not that good, but it has one key element not found elsewhere as far as I know, and that is the "say it fast" (as I remember -- is that how they teach it?) instruction for putting the sounds together to make a word. For most children, that doesn't come easily and there's a terrible hump between sounding out each sound and putting them together in a word.

100 Easy Lessons offers a way to get over that hump. That's its utility. Once that one element is mastered, the child can be freed from all those lessons.

Otherwise, it's annoying because the "stories" are inane and the orthography is counterproductive, since it's not found anywhere else. It's an ugly book and way too long!

Expand full comment
christina mermis's avatar

I’m currently teaching my seventh child to read. I’ve used 100 Easy Lessons for them all as well as tons of read alouds and reader books they like. I think it is all good! I have a couple kids I’ve gone back with explicit phonics instruction to help with certain struggles each was experiencing. The really tough thing that no one wants to hear is that… each human is so different. Sorry to burst bubbles but the idea of a single reading instruction method working best for everyone is just not realistic. And therein lies the beauty of homeschooling. You can adjust and tinker and perfect each child’s approach to falling in love with reading. The only “one thing that everyone should do” - is to realize that the goal is falling in love with reading. Period. Not reading by 5 or 8 or progressing at some predetermined pace or sequence. It is to fall in love with reading.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts